next up previous contents
Next: Submission Up: EMSD Efficiency Neda Document Previous: Introduction   Contents


Study Overview

We have chosen to compare the efficiency of using EMSD to the efficiency obtained by other submission and delivery protocols in this study. While it is debatable whether EMSD can be placed at the same level as the test protocols, we nonetheless feel that a study such as this is quite useful and provides a common denominator to discuss various aspects of EMSD performance.

The experiments cover both submission (from a mobile unit) and delivery (to a mobile unit). Under submission we looked at comparing EMSD and SMTP. The delivery experiments tested EMSD vs. SMTP, POP, and IMAP. In all cases a single uniform test message was relayed between two devices (a recipient or sender, and a mail server) and the data traffic recorded. Although you cannot compare EMSD directly to any one messaging protocol, because each protocol is designed to perform a specific function, you can compare the results obtained by each messaging solution. The following table illustrates the functions supported by each protocol. Note that EMSD is the most like SMTP.


Table 1: Messaging Protocols
Protocol Submission Delivery Relay Retrieval Mailbox Mailbox
          Access Sync
SMTP X X X X    
IMAP       X X X
POP       X    
EMSD X X   X    



next up previous contents
Next: Submission Up: EMSD Efficiency Neda Document Previous: Introduction   Contents